Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit could be allowed when the inputs were claimed to be duty-paid but the assessees failed to produce verifiable evidence that the goods were received under the corrected gate pass and the earlier gate pass had been issued without duty debit.
Analysis: The majority held that the assessees had not produced the gate pass said to relate to the goods and that the record created serious doubt about receipt of the consignments under the revised gate pass. In the absence of reliable proof that the inputs were covered by the valid duty-paid gate pass at the relevant time, the credit already taken could not be sustained. It was further held that subsequent payment of duty by the supplier did not regularise a credit that had been wrongly taken earlier.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was not admissible on the facts proved, and the order directing reversal of credit was upheld.