TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Classification of Imported Finned Tubes under Customs Tariff Act Upheld</h1> The Tribunal held that the imported finned tubes are correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 73.17/19 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The appeal was ... Classificastion Issues Involved:1. Classification of imported finned tubes under the correct Customs Tariff Item.2. Determination of whether the imported goods are parts and merit classification under Customs Tariff Item 84.17(i).Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Classification of Imported Finned TubesThe appellants, M/s. Coromandal Fertilizers Ltd., contested the re-assessment of finned tubes under Tariff Item 73.17/19(1) instead of the original classification under Item 84.17(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) upheld the re-assessment, stating that the tubes are correctly classifiable under Item 73.17/19(1) as per CCCN Notes, which, although not part of the CTA, have persuasive evidential value in international trade. The appellants argued that the imported finned tubes should be classified under Item 84.17(i), emphasizing that the tubes were specific items meant for replacing parts in machinery and were made to stringent specifications.The Tribunal examined the descriptions under both Tariff Entries:- 73.17/19: Tubes and pipes and blanks thereof, of iron or steel.- 84.17: Machinery, plant, and similar laboratory equipment for the treatment of materials by processes involving temperature changes.The Tribunal noted that the product is known in the market as finned tubes, though described as HYFIN in the manufacturer's catalog. The appellants argued that the product was not ordinary tubes but designed to stringent specifications for machinery fitment, thus meriting classification under a more specific heading (84.17) rather than a general one (73.17/19).Issue 2: Determination of Whether the Imported Goods are PartsThe appellants contended that the finned tubes were specific parts meant for machinery and not general iron or steel tubes. They cited Rule 3A of the Interpretative Rules, which states that a more specific description shall be preferred over a general one. They also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Moorco (India) Ltd. v. Collector of Cus., Madras, which supports the preference for specific descriptions.The Tribunal observed that the finned tubes did not specifically figure in either Tariff Item 73.17/19 or 84.17. The Collector had referred to CCCN Explanatory Notes, which indicated that finned tubes are classified under Chapter Heading 73.17/19. The Tribunal agreed with this classification, emphasizing that the product is known as finned tubes in trade parlance and should be classified accordingly.Conclusion:The Tribunal held that the imported finned tubes are correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 73.17/19 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld. The Tribunal's decision was based on the product's market recognition, the specific mention of finned tubes in CCCN Notes, and the preference for a more specific description as per the Supreme Court's ruling.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
