Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on arrears of cane cess, arising from delayed payment under the statutory levy, was deductible as revenue expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The liability to pay the interest did not arise from any borrowing of capital or consensual lending arrangement. The payment was made because the assessee failed to deposit the cess within time and had challenged the levy as unconstitutional. Such interest was therefore not interest on borrowed capital within the scope of section 10(2)(iii). Nor could it be treated as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business under section 10(2)(xv) or as an item deductible in computing business profits under section 10(1), because the outgoing sprang from breach of a statutory obligation and was not incidental to the carrying on of the business. The expenditure was not incurred for business necessity or commercial expediency in the legal sense applicable to deductible business outgoings.
Conclusion: The interest paid on arrears of cess was not allowable as revenue expenditure and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest paid for default in discharging a statutory liability is not deductible as business expenditure unless it is shown to arise from capital borrowed or to be incidental to the carrying on of the business.