Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commission payable to Mahadevan was deductible under the Income-tax Act and the Excess Profits Tax Act, and whether excess profits tax was to be deducted in computing the net profits on which the commission was payable.
Analysis: The commission to an employee fell within the specific provision governing bonus or commission paid for services rendered, and that provision controlled the allowance of such expenditure rather than the general residuary deduction clause. The reasonableness of the commission had to be judged with reference to the employee's pay, the conditions of service, the profits of the business, and the general practice in similar businesses. For excess profits tax purposes, the governing rule permitted only such expenditure as was reasonable and necessary having regard to the requirements of the business, a test substantially aligned with commercial expediency. On the computation of net profits, excess profits tax was not an item to be deducted before arriving at net profits, because it was a charge on profits and not part of the expenditure required to earn them.
Conclusion: The commission paid to Mahadevan was allowable, and it had to be calculated on net profits without first deducting excess profits tax.