Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pharma yeast or dried inactive yeast was classifiable under Heading 30.03 as a medicament, or whether it fell under Heading 21.02 of Chapter 21 and was therefore outside the exemption claimed under Notification No. 234/86-C.E.
Analysis: Chapter 21 covers yeasts, active or inactive, but its Note 1 excludes yeast put up as a medicament or other products of Chapter 30. The product manufactured by the appellant was found to be inactive dried yeast sold as a raw material for further manufacture, and not put up by the appellant as a medicament. The fact that the product had therapeutic utility, or that it was later used by others to make medicinal tablets, did not convert the appellant's own product into a medicament. The material did not satisfy the basis for classification under Heading 30.03, and the exclusion in Chapter 21 was not attracted on the facts.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Chapter 21 and not under Heading 30.03; the claim for exemption on the footing that it was a medicament failed.