Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid under an approved and unchallenged classification list could be recovered by way of refund on the ground that the goods were later claimed to be classifiable under a different heading.
Analysis: A classification list finally approved under Rule 173B operates as a quasi-judicial determination of classification before assessment. Such a determination cannot be reopened or reviewed indirectly through a refund claim once the assessment based on it has become final. If an assessee disputes the classification, the proper course is to challenge the classification order directly by appeal. A later approval of a different classification list would not undo the earlier final assessment for the relevant period.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable against the earlier approved classification, and the order directing refund could not stand.