Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs used in preparing sand moulds and sand cores for manufacture of steel castings, and whether such mould-related inputs could be treated as inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product.
Analysis: The inputs in dispute, other than grinding wheels, were used in the preparation of sand moulds, which formed an essential and integral stage in the manufacture of steel castings. The expression "intermediate product" in Rule 57D(2) was construed broadly to cover products emerging during sequential manufacturing processes within the factory, not merely products arising in a single process chain. Credit on inputs used in such intermediate manufacture could not be denied merely because the intermediate stage was sand mould production. Grinding wheels stood on a different footing and were treated as tools falling within the exclusion to Rule 57A.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the mould-related inputs was admissible, and the appeals succeeded; credit on grinding wheels was not available.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs consumed in the manufacture of an intermediate product used in the course of producing the final excisable product are eligible for Modvat credit, and the exclusion under Rule 57A applies to the relevant input only when the input itself falls within the exclusion.