Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit on steel plates and sheets used to fabricate steel pipes, which were in turn used in the manufacture of turbine-generator equipment, was admissible notwithstanding the Revenue's objection that the pipes were not capital goods and that no duty had been paid on the intermediate pipes.
Analysis: The credit claim was examined in the light of the remand direction and the scheme of Rule 57A, Rule 57C and Rule 57D(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal noted that the steel pipes were an essential and integral part of the turbine-generator set and that the set itself fell within the category of capital goods. It further held that the manufacture of pipes from the disputed steel plates and sheets was only an intermediate stage in the process leading to the final capital goods, and that credit could not be denied merely because the intermediate product was not separately subjected to duty. The reliance placed on the Revenue's objection based on exemption and non-payment of duty on the pipes was held not to dislodge the applicability of the credit provisions, particularly where the inputs were used in relation to manufacture within the factory.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit on the steel plates and sheets was admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing credit was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on inputs used to manufacture an intermediate product is allowable when that intermediate product is an integral step in the manufacture of dutiable capital goods, and denial cannot rest solely on the fact that the intermediate product itself was not duty paid.