Letter of Authority imports for a government department upheld, with confiscation and penalty found unsustainable on the documentary record.

Goods imported under a Letter of Authority for NRSA were treated as imports made for and on behalf of the Government department, because the agreement expressly required the appellants to act in that capacity and the documentary record supported that position. The 35% CIF component was regarded as remuneration for services, not a profit-sharing term showing a sale transaction. A stray reference to margin of profit in correspondence was treated as an inadvertent misstatement that could not outweigh the Letter of Authority, NRSA certificate, and import documents. Filing the Bill of Entry in the appellants' own name was not fatal where the procedure permitted Letter of Authority holders to cause the import, so confiscation, redemption fine, and personal penalty were unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were Letter of Authority holders importing the goods for NRSA, and whether the resulting confiscation and penalty were sustainable.

Analysis: The agreement between NRSA and the appellants expressly required the appellants to act as Letter of Authority holders and import the specified items. The stipulated 35% CIF amount was treated as remuneration for services, not as a profit-sharing arrangement indicative of a sale transaction. The documentary record, including the Letter of Authority, certificate from NRSA, and accompanying import documents, supported the position that the goods were imported for and on behalf of NRSA. A single reference in correspondence describing the amount as margin of profit was held to be an inadvertent misstatement and insufficient to displace the broader documentary evidence. The filing of the Bill of Entry in the appellants' own name was also not treated as fatal, since the handbook procedure permitted Letter of Authority holders for Government departments to cause the import.

Conclusion: The appellants were held to be valid Letter of Authority holders for NRSA, and the confiscation, redemption fine, and personal penalty were unsustainable.

---