Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether passports seized under Section 38 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could be retained indefinitely, or whether they had to be returned after the investigation and connected adjudication were completed.
Analysis: Section 38 permits seizure of documents relevant to an investigation, but such custody cannot continue for an indefinite period without a live connection to the inquiry or proceedings. Section 41, though dealing with documents directly evidencing contravention, reflects the legislative policy that seized material should not remain in custody beyond a reasonable period, and the retention must be tied to the progress of investigation and adjudication. The Court also treated prolonged retention of a passport as potentially unreasonable and directed that the investigation be completed within a fixed time so that the seized passports could be dealt with in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The passports could not be retained indefinitely and were to be returned after completion of the investigation within the time directed by the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Documents seized under Section 38 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 may be retained only so long as they remain relevant to a pending investigation or connected proceedings, and such custody must continue only for a reasonable period.