Excise Tribunal: PVA Classified Under Tariff Item 15A

The Tribunal determined that Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is excisable and classifiable under Tariff Item 15A of the Central Excise Tariff. The decision overturned the classification made by the Collector (Appeals) under Tariff Item 68. The Tribunal clarified that PVA, as a water-soluble synthetic resin, falls under the category of organic polymers and is subject to excise duty under Item 15A. The department's appeal was upheld, setting aside the Collector (Appeals) order.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was excisableRs.
2. If excisable, whether it was classifiable under CET Item 15A or 68 and liable to dutyRs.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was excisableRs.

The respondents, M/s. Cellulose Products of India Limited, claimed that PVA was non-excisable. However, the Assistant Collector held it as excisable under Item 15A. The department contended that PVA was excisable and classifiable under TI 15A, arguing that PVA is a derivative of polyvinyl acetate, manufactured by polymerisation processes, and hence merited classification under Tariff Item 15A.

The Tribunal noted that polyvinyl alcohol is an organic chemical produced by a multi-stage process involving polymerisation. The technical literature, including McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science and Technology, and the Condensed Chemical Dictionary, described PVA as a water-soluble polymer made by hydrolysis of a polyvinyl ester. The Tribunal concluded that PVA is a polyhydric alcohol in the nature of a water-soluble synthetic resin belonging to the family of organic polymers, thus making it excisable.

2. If excisable, whether it was classifiable under CET Item 15A or 68 and liable to dutyRs.

The Assistant Collector classified PVA under Item 15A, which was contested by the respondents. The Collector (Appeals) classified it under TI 68, which the department challenged. The department argued that the exclusion clause under TI 68 would only apply if the product does not fall under Items 1 to 67 of the CET. The Tribunal referenced the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's observation in M/s. Darshan Hosiery Works v. Union of India, which stated that the expression "not elsewhere specified" in Item 68 means total omission or failure to be specified as goods in the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

The Tribunal also considered the decision in the case of Sun Export Corporation, which held that PVA is a polymerisation product and classifiable under Item 15A. The Tribunal observed that TI 15A CET covers artificial or synthetic resins in the production of which polymerisation was involved at some stage. The Tribunal concluded that PVA, being a resinous polymer, is classifiable under Tariff Item 15A.

The Tribunal further discussed the constitutional provisions, particularly Entry 84 in List No. 2, which excludes "alcoholic liquors for human consumption" from excise duties. The Tribunal clarified that the exclusion clause in Item 68 CET could not be interpreted to include organic chemicals like polyhydric alcohols. The Tribunal emphasized that the words "alcohol, all sorts, including alcoholic liquors for human consumption" in Item 68 should be understood in common parlance, which does not include industrial alcohols or organic chemicals.

The Tribunal noted that the Bombay High Court's judgment in the case of Raman Kantilal Bhandari, which related to the import of Pentaerithericol and its classification under TI 68, did not apply to the present case. The Tribunal followed its own decision in the case of Sun Export Corporation, which specifically classified PVA under Tariff Item 15A.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that polyvinyl alcohol is an excisable product and classifiable under Tariff Item 15A, CET. The impugned order of the Collector (Appeals) was set aside, and the department's appeal was accepted.

---