Leather cut to glove shapes treated as an article of leather, defeating waste classification and exemption claim.

Leather cut to special shapes for use as glove components is classifiable as an article of leather under Heading 42.01/06, not as parings or other waste of leather under Heading 41.02/10, because the supplier description, examination report and explanatory notes showed goods suitable for making gloves rather than waste material. On that classification, the claimed exemption under Notification No. 60/85-Cus. failed, since it applied only to Chapter 41 goods such as parings, splits or other waste of leather. The challenge to both classification and denial of exemption was rejected and the impugned order sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the imported leather pieces were classifiable as parings and other waste of leather under Heading 41.02/10 or as other articles of leather under Heading 42.01/06; (ii) Whether the goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 60/85-Cus. dated 17.03.1985.

Issue (i): Whether the imported leather pieces were classifiable as parings and other waste of leather under Heading 41.02/10 or as other articles of leather under Heading 42.01/06.

Analysis: The goods were described by the supplier as glove components and the examination report showed rectangular and finger-shaped cut pieces suitable for making gloves. The classification opinions and explanatory notes indicated that leather cut to special shapes for making a particular article is treated as an article of leather and not as waste. The evidence did not support the claim that the goods were merely cushioning material or waste leather.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 42.01/06 as other articles of leather.

Issue (ii): Whether the goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 60/85-Cus. dated 17.03.1985.

Analysis: The exemption claimed was available only if the goods fell within Chapter 41 as parings, splits, or other waste of leather. Since the goods were held to be classifiable under Heading 42.01/06, the condition for the exemption was not satisfied.

Conclusion: The goods were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 60/85-Cus. dated 17.03.1985.

Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge to the classification and denial of exemption failed, and the impugned order was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Leather cut to special shapes and imported as components for a particular article is classifiable as an article of leather, and exemption confined to Chapter 41 goods cannot be claimed once such classification is upheld.

---