Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported outsert blades and deckle seals, composed partly of ceramic material, retained the character of ceramic articles excluded from Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, or were classifiable as parts of paper making machinery under sub-heading 8439.99.
Analysis: The goods were designed for use as component parts of paper making machinery and performed the function of extracting excess water during sheet formation. Although the lower authorities treated the functional portion as ceramic and applied the exclusion in Chapter Note 1(b) to Chapter 84, the determining test was whether the goods had, by reason of their composition, lost the character of ceramic articles. The higher proportion of non-ceramic material, together with the supplier's certificate showing that only about 40% of the goods was ceramic by weight, supported the conclusion that the articles were combinations with a high proportion of other materials and therefore fell outside the ceramic exclusion. The goods were also suitable solely or principally for use with a particular machine, bringing them within the scheme of Section Note 2 of Section XVI and the heading covering machinery for making or finishing paper.
Conclusion: The imported outsert blades and related deckle seals were not classifiable under Heading 69.14 as ceramic articles and were correctly classifiable under sub-heading 8439.99 as parts of paper making machinery, in favour of the assessee.