Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Agricultural Income-tax Officer could invoke section 37 to rectify completed assessments for the relevant assessment years by relying on material found in the assessment proceedings for a different year.
Analysis: Section 37 empowers rectification only of a mistake apparent from the record of the assessment sought to be rectified. For that purpose, the assessing authority cannot travel beyond the record of the relevant assessment year or rely on materials discovered in later proceedings for another year. Since the notices and rectification orders were founded on a partition deed produced in proceedings for a subsequent assessment year, and not on any mistake apparent from the record of the three assessments in question, the statutory condition for exercising rectification power was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The rectification orders were without jurisdiction and were liable to be quashed, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded because rectification under section 37 could be exercised only on the basis of an apparent mistake in the record of the very assessment under challenge, not by using extraneous material from another assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification power for a mistake apparent from the record cannot be exercised on the basis of material outside the relevant assessment record.