Exemption notification construed without exclusivity condition, so plastic articles with some additional inputs still qualified for relief.

Articles of plastic falling under Tariff Item 68 remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E. because the notification did not require manufacture wholly or exclusively from the specified materials under Tariff Item 15A(1). The Tribunal applied the principle that exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods contain some additional materials, unless the notification expressly imposes an exclusivity condition. As the articles were made predominantly from the specified plastic materials and only partly from other inputs, the exemption was available and the departmental denial was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether articles of plastic falling under Tariff Item 68 were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E. dated 11-5-1982 when they were manufactured predominantly from materials falling under Tariff Item 15A(1) but also contained some materials falling under Tariff Item 15A(3).

Analysis: The notification did not expressly require that the exempted articles of plastic must be manufactured wholly, exclusively, or only from the specified materials under Tariff Item 15A(1). The Tribunal applied the settled principle that an exemption cannot be denied merely because the product contains some additional materials, unless the notification itself imposes an exclusivity condition. On that construction, articles made mainly from the specified plastic materials and having some admixture of other inputs remained within the exemption.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E., and the departmental denial of benefit was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification does not require a product to be manufactured wholly or exclusively from specified materials, the benefit cannot be denied merely because the product contains some additional non-specified inputs.

---