1994 (3) TMI 204 - AT - Central Excise

CEGAT Rules Plastic Articles Eligible for Central Excise Duty Exemption under Notification

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the eligibility of plastic articles for exemption from Central ... Composite articles of plastics Issues:1. Interpretation of Notification No. 182/82-C.E., dated 11-5-1982 for exemption eligibility.2. Consideration of whether products made predominantly from one material but with an admixture of another material are eligible for exemption.3. Allegations of discrimination and inconsistency in the application of exemption rules.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of plastic articles for exemption from Central Excise duty under Notification No. 182/82-C.E., dated 11-5-1982. The central issue was whether articles of plastic, falling under Tariff Item 68, could be considered eligible for exemption even if they were not exclusively manufactured from materials specified in Tariff Item 15A(1).The appellants argued that the exemption should not be denied based on the absence of a specific requirement in the notification mandating exclusive use of materials from Tariff Item 15A(1). They cited relevant case laws to support their contention that unless a notification explicitly states the requirement of exclusive use of specified materials, the exemption cannot be denied for products made with an admixture of other materials.On the other hand, the respondents contended that the products in question were not eligible for exemption under the notification as they were not exclusively made from materials falling under Tariff Item 15A(1). They emphasized that the language of the notification clearly indicated that the exemption was applicable only to articles made exclusively from specified plastic materials.The Tribunal referred to previous decisions, including the Indian Organic Chemicals case, which highlighted that unless a notification explicitly requires exclusive use of specified materials, products made with an admixture of other materials could still be eligible for exemption. Based on this interpretation, the Tribunal accepted the appellants' argument that products predominantly made from materials in Tariff Item 15A(1) with an admixture of materials from Tariff Item 15A(3) were also eligible for exemption under Notification No. 182/82-C.E., dated 11-5-1982.Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, granting them consequential relief. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the notification and upheld the eligibility of products with a mixture of specified and non-specified materials for exemption, emphasizing the need for explicit requirements in exemption notifications.