Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants, on opting out of the Modvat Scheme and claiming exemption, were required to reverse the credit relatable to inputs lying unutilised in stock on the date of opting out.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the scope of the reversal obligation under Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules. The record showed that the appellants had availed Modvat credit and later opted out of the scheme with effect from 1-4-1989 while continuing to claim exemption under Notification No. 175/86. The liable credit had to be reversed in relation to the inputs remaining unutilised as on the date of opting out. On the figures available, the credit required to be reversed worked out to Rs. 38,893.63, whereas only Rs. 22,959.32 had been reversed and a further Rs. 5,954.53 paid by challan, leaving a balance of Rs. 9,979.78.
Conclusion: The appellants were bound to reverse the full credit attributable to unutilised inputs on the date of opting out, and the demand for the shortfall was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the demand represented the unpaid balance of credit required to be reversed on exit from the Modvat Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: When a dealer opts out of Modvat, credit attributable to inputs remaining unutilised on that date must be reversed in full; partial reversal does not discharge the statutory obligation.