Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of set-off under the exemption notification, when not availed because the claim was rejected at the departmental stage, could subsequently be claimed by way of cash refund.
Analysis: The relevant notification entitled the assessee to set off the duty paid on the input used in the manufacture of the finished products, and the notification did not prescribe any exclusive procedure requiring the benefit to be taken only by adjustment. The claim had earlier been rejected by the Assistant Collector, and the assessee was later held eligible in appeal, but by then the notification had been rescinded, making adjustment impossible. The legal position relied on in the cited decisions was that where an exemption or set-off provision is silent on procedure, the benefit cannot be denied merely because it is sought in the form of cash refund, provided duty-paid input and corresponding finished-product duty are established.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to claim the set-off benefit by way of cash refund, and the refusal to entertain the refund claim on the ground that no duty had been paid was not sustainable.