Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 350/76-Cus. dated 2-8-1976 for the imported chain assembly for motor graders in the absence of an earlier filed end-use affidavit.
Analysis: The imported goods were supported by an end-use affidavit certifying that the assembly was imported for manufacture of motor graders, with correct particulars linking it to the relevant bill of entry. The respondent accepted that the affidavit satisfied the notification conditions. The earlier rejection was solely for want of the affidavit, and that deficiency stood cured by the produced document.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of the notification and the claim for consequential relief succeeded.