Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of denying small scale exemption, the value of parts of diesel engines used captively in the manufacture of filter assemblies cleared under Chapter X procedure could be included notwithstanding Notification No. 217/85-C.E., and whether pre-deposit and penalty ought to be waived pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute turned on a prima facie claim that Notification No. 217/85-C.E. extended exemption to parts of diesel engines without confining it to named components. The captively consumed filter heads and filter elements were used in the manufacture of filter assemblies cleared under Chapter X procedure. On that basis, their value was considered not liable to be added for denying small scale exemption. The Tribunal found support for this view from the cited precedent treating components used in manufacture as eligible parts for exemption. On that prima facie assessment, the requirement of immediate deposit was dispensed with.
Conclusion: The applicants were granted stay and waiver of duty and penalty on furnishing a personal bond, and the value of the captively used parts was prima facie not to be included for denial of the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: Captively consumed parts that are covered by an exemption notification cannot, on a prima facie basis, be added to the assessable value for denying small scale exemption, and pre-deposit may be waived where such entitlement is shown.