Additional evidence and remand followed where the production register went to the root of the dispute and required fresh examination.

The production register extract was admitted as additional evidence because it had a direct bearing on the dispute, was supported by affidavit, and the seized register remained with the Revenue. As the impugned order did not substantively discuss that record, the Tribunal found that the interests of justice required examination of the complete production register by the adjudicating authority. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication after giving both sides an opportunity to be heard and ensuring compliance with natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the production register extract could be admitted as additional evidence and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The application for admission of additional evidence was supported by affidavit. The register extract had a direct bearing on the dispute and the adjudicating authority had referred to the production register, but the record showed no substantive discussion of it in the impugned order. The seized register remained with the Revenue, and the interests of justice required that the complete production register be examined by the adjudicating authority. Since the matter involved evidence going to the root of the dispute, the Tribunal admitted the additional evidence and directed fresh examination after affording opportunity to both sides.

Conclusion: The additional evidence was admitted, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after examining the production register and following natural justice. This was in favour of the assessee to the extent of remand and admission of additional evidence.

---