Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to higher notional credit in respect of special excise duty under the amended Notification No. 175/86, and whether such credit could exceed the maximum ceiling of 5% ad valorem.
Analysis: Rule 57B was treated as the source of authority for claiming higher notional credit, and the credit had to be allowed only at the rates specified in the notification issued under Rule 8(1) or Section 5A(1). The amended Notification No. 175/86 fixed the maximum higher notional credit at 5% ad valorem. The claim for 10.5% was held to be beyond that ceiling. The fact that special excise duty was a specified duty eligible for Modvat credit did not permit an enlarged notional credit beyond the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to higher notional credit on special excise duty beyond 5% ad valorem, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The ceiling fixed under the notification governed the extent of higher notional credit, and the assessee could not claim a benefit in excess of that limit merely because special excise duty was linked to basic duty.
Ratio Decidendi: Higher notional credit under the Modvat scheme can be claimed only within the maximum rate expressly prescribed by the applicable notification, and statutory linkage between duties does not override that ceiling.