Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on scrap of bare aluminium and copper wires, and on scrap of insulated wires and cables, when MODVAT credit had been availed on the inputs and the scrap was claimed to be covered by the relevant exemption notifications.
Analysis: The classification list had shown nil duty and the department had verified the MODVAT records and duty-paying documents. The evidence indicated that the inputs had borne additional duty and that the scrap arose from the processing of such inputs. Rule 57F(4) permitted waste arising from processed inputs to be removed either on payment of duty or without payment of duty where the prescribed conditions and procedure were satisfied. The exemption notifications relied upon by the appellants exempted waste and scrap of aluminium and copper when the stipulated conditions were met, and the departmental objection that no proof existed of payment of additional duty on the inputs was not accepted on the record.
Conclusion: The scrap was not liable to central excise duty and the demand was unsustainable.