Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption from central excise duty on waste and scrap arising in manufacture could be denied merely because Modvat credit had been taken on the inputs.
Analysis: Rule 57D protected credit taken on inputs from being denied or varied merely because part of the inputs emerged as waste, refuse or by-product during manufacture, including where such waste was exempt from duty or chargeable at nil rate. The benefit of the exemption notifications could not be refused on the sole ground that Modvat credit had been availed on the inputs. The cited Tribunal decisions also supported the view that availing Modvat credit did not take away eligibility to the exemption claimed for the waste products.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was unsustainable. The assessee was entitled to clear the waste and scrap without being denied the benefit of exemption on the ground of Modvat credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption on waste or scrap arising in manufacture cannot be denied merely because Modvat credit was taken on the inputs, where the governing rule preserves the credit notwithstanding the emergence of exempt waste or refuse.