Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for purposes of interim relief, compounded rubber remained eligible for small scale exemption under the amended exemption notification and whether the applicants were entitled to stay and waiver of recovery of the duty demanded.
Analysis: The amended notification deleting tariff heading 4005.00 from the excluded category was read as supporting exemption from 31-3-1989. The departmental trade notice also stated that compounded rubber was eligible for exemption from that date. The suggested reliance on other amending notifications as rectifying any mistake in the amendment was found not prima facie tenable, as those notifications had no relevant connection with the deletion or inclusion of item 4005.
Conclusion: A prima facie case existed in favour of the applicants. Stay of recovery and waiver of recovery of the duty amount were granted on furnishing a personal bond for the duty amount within the stipulated time.