Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application for rectification of mistake was maintainable and whether any mistake existed in the Tribunal's earlier order regarding the period of duty liability and deduction of turnover under the exemption notification.
Analysis: The earlier order had already reduced the duty demand period from 18-1-1989 to 20-3-1989 to 25-1-1989 to 20-3-1989. On that basis, the turnover for 18-1-1989 to 24-1-1989 had to be excluded, and only the turnover for 25-1-1989 to 20-3-1989 remained relevant. From that turnover, the exemption limit of Rs. 15 lakhs under Notification No. 175/86 was required to be deducted. Since the requested correction did not disclose any mistake apparent from the record, the rectification petition was misconceived.
Conclusion: No rectifiable mistake was found and the application was not maintainable.