Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty pending disposal of the appeal, and whether a partial deposit should be directed on the basis of the prima facie valuation of the disputed goods.
Analysis: The application arose from a penalty imposed for alleged contravention in importing second-hand machinery by fictitious or non-existent firms and for alleged breach of the import control regime. The Tribunal found that the applicants had not established a strong prima facie case on merits for complete waiver at this stage. At the same time, the Tribunal considered the apparent FOB value of the disputed consignment and, after adding freight and insurance, treated the effective value as approximately Rs. 3 lakhs for the purpose of interim relief. In that context, it directed a limited deposit and granted waiver of the balance penalty with stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The request for complete waiver was declined, but the applicants obtained partial interim relief by being required to deposit only Rs. 3 lakhs and securing waiver and stay of the remaining penalty.