Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the animal feed supplements manufactured and marketed as vitamin and mineral formulations were classifiable under Chapter 23 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as preparations of a kind used in animal feeding, or under Chapter 29.
Analysis: The classification turned on the scope of Heading 23.02 and the meaning of the word "includes" in the chapter note to Chapter 23. The prior Tribunal decision on identical products had held that the heading is of wide import and that animal feed supplements devised to compensate deficiencies of proteins, minerals and vitamins fall within it. The contemporaneous understanding reflected in departmental correspondence and tariff conference notes also supported classification under Chapter 23, and the HSN corresponding heading was treated as a useful guide in construing the tariff entry.
Conclusion: The products were correctly classifiable under Chapter 23 and not under Chapter 29; the assessee's classification was accepted.