Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether di-calcium phosphate manufactured by the assessee was correctly classifiable under heading 23099090 as a preparation of a kind used in animal feeding, or under heading 28352500 as an inorganic chemical.
Analysis: The product and its manufacturing process were not in dispute. The controlling consideration was its end use as a supplement in animal feed manufacture. The scope of heading 2309 was treated as inclusive, and the description was applied to goods of a kind used in animal feeding. On that basis, the product was held to answer the description under heading 23099090. The contrary classification under heading 28352500 was rejected.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable under heading 23099090 and not under heading 28352500, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned classification order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used as a supplement in animal feed are classifiable under the tariff entry covering preparations of a kind used in animal feeding when the entry is otherwise apt, and an inclusive chapter note does not confine the entry only to the illustrative materials mentioned therein.