Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported combustion chamber unit, made of graphite and consisting of upper shell, intermediate shell, lower shell and fittings, was classifiable under Heading 84.17 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as machinery, plant or similar equipment, or under Heading 68.01/16 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as articles of stone or other mineral substances.
Analysis: The imported goods were found to constitute a complete unit or equipment designed for a specific process of burning hydrogen with chlorine to produce hydrochloric acid. The decisive factor was the function performed by the goods, not merely the material used in their manufacture. Chapter Note 1(a) to Chapter 84 excluded articles falling within Chapter 68, but that exclusion was held not to govern a complete machinery item whose proper classification depended on its use and character as plant or equipment. The record also showed that the goods were treated as a combustion chamber assembly and not as mere spare parts.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.17 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Heading 68.01/16 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an imported article is a complete machinery or plant unit, tariff classification is governed primarily by its function and intended use rather than the material from which it is made.