Modvat credit filing requirement treated as procedural, with timely filing before the Range Superintendent supporting rectification and entitlement.

Modvat entitlement under Rule 57G turned on whether the declaration was filed in time when it was acknowledged by the Range Superintendent on 31-3-1986, even though it reached the Assistant Collector later. The procedural requirement in Rule 57G(2) was treated as satisfied by filing with either officer, and the Board's clarification supported credit from the date of such filing. The earlier omission to notice this record was held to be an error apparent on the face of the record, so rectification was allowed and Modvat credit was recognised for inputs taken on 1-4-1986.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order denying Modvat credit could be rectified on the ground that the declaration under Rule 57-G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had been filed with and acknowledged by the Range Superintendent on 31-3-1986, even though it reached the Assistant Collector on 2-4-1986.

Analysis: The declaration forming the basis of Modvat entitlement was already on the record and had been acknowledged by the Range Superintendent on 31-3-1986. The later forwarding to the Assistant Collector did not alter the fact that the declaration had been filed within the relevant time. Rule 57G(2) was treated as a procedural requirement, and the Board's clarification supported the view that credit under the Modvat scheme is available from the date of filing with either the Range Superintendent or the Assistant Collector. The earlier failure to notice this material record was held to be an error apparent on the face of the record.

Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit for the inputs taken on 1-4-1986.

---