Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal had power to vacate its earlier consequential order in the assessment appeal and decide that appeal afresh after the connected order under section 27 was set aside.
Analysis: The Tribunal's earlier order allowing the assessment appeal was not a substantive decision on merits, but a consequential order dependent on the acceptance of the assessee's challenge to the refusal under section 27. Once the order rejecting the section 27 application was required to stand, the consequential order in the assessment appeal could not survive. The appellate jurisdiction conferred on the Tribunal carries by necessary implication all powers reasonably required to make that jurisdiction effective, including passing consequential orders so that the appeal is not rendered nugatory.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in vacating the earlier order and in rehearing the assessment appeal afresh; the answer is in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: A consequential order passed in an appeal may be recalled and the appeal reheard where the foundation for that order disappears, because the Tribunal's appellate power includes the implied authority to make its jurisdiction effective.
Ratio Decidendi: An appellate tribunal has implied power to pass and, where necessary, to vacate consequential orders so as to make its appellate jurisdiction effective and prevent its decision from being rendered nugatory.