Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery on the ground that the original show cause notice had been materially altered by a corrigendum.
Analysis: The application concerned a demand arising from alleged non-accountal of aluminium scrap removed under Rule 57F(2). A subsequent corrigendum substituted the basis of demand and changed the complexion of the notice. On the record, the original demand founded on shortage could not prima facie be maintained once the relevant portion of the notice had been substituted. The applicants therefore made out a prima facie case for dispensing with pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.