Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Collector (Appeals) could condone the delay in filing the appeals beyond the further period of three months prescribed under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The appeal provision requires filing within three months from communication of the order and permits condonation only for a further period of three months on sufficient cause being shown. The statutory language limits the appellate authority's power, and the discretion to condone delay cannot extend beyond the outer limit fixed by the statute. Since the appeals were filed after the permissible period, the delay was beyond the authority's condonable limit.
Conclusion: The Collector (Appeals) had no power to condone the delay beyond three months, and the appeals were not maintainable.