Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rental income derived from letting out vacant godowns belonged under the head "income from property" or under the head "profits and gains of business".
Analysis: The receipt arose from leases of godowns owned by the assessee after the cessation of its earlier oil-mill and soap businesses. The Court distinguished authorities where plant, machinery, vaults, or other commercial assets were let out in circumstances showing a continuing business activity. It applied the principle that if income falls squarely within a specific head of income, it cannot be taken out of that head merely because it may also bear some relation to business. Income from tenants of owned buildings is specifically dealt with by section 9, while section 10 governs profits and gains of business carried on by the assessee.
Conclusion: The rental income was assessable under section 9 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and not under section 10. The answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where rental receipts arise from ownership and letting of buildings, and the receipt is specifically covered by the head "income from property", it must be assessed under that specific head rather than under the head of business income.