Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received under the agreement was assessable as business income under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, or as income from other sources under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The agreement repeatedly described the second party as managing agent or power agent and preserved the assessee's ownership, licence, and inspection rights. The arrangement showed that the machinery was put into commission for working the factory and not merely let out as idle assets. A fixed monthly guaranteed payment did not, by itself, convert the arrangement into a lease or negate the carrying on of business. The decisive feature was that the working of the looms was undertaken on behalf of the assessee in a principal-agent relationship.
Conclusion: The income was rightly treated as business income and not as income from other sources.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the agreement did not create a lease, but only an agency for carrying on the business, so the receipts were taxable under the business head.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a commercial asset is worked through an agent under an arrangement that preserves the owner's control and ownership and is intended to carry on the business, the resulting receipts constitute business income even if the return is fixed.