Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether industrial nylon yarn capable of use both for tyres and for belting for machinery was classifiable as "Nylon tyre yarn" under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 38-Customs dated 01.03.1978, or was entitled to the residuary benefit under Serial No. 8.
Analysis: The term "Nylon tyre yarn" was not defined in the notification, and the material on record showed that the yarn could be used for tyres as well as for belting. The product literature described it as a versatile yarn with multiple applications, including conveyor belts. A specific label could not be attached to such yarn merely because it was capable of use in tyre manufacture. The earlier notification had expressly provided a concessional regime linked to actual end-use for belting, but the later notification did not contain such a restrictive or exclusive formulation. In these circumstances, the notification had to be construed in a meaningful way, and the yarn could not be denied the lower residuary rate merely because it was capable of use in tyres.
Conclusion: The yarn was not confined to the specific entry "Nylon tyre yarn" and was entitled to the residuary benefit under Serial No. 8, subject to proof of end-use in belting to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector.