Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notifications withdrawing exemption from export duty on black pepper and revising the rate of duty became operative on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, so as to make the revised duty applicable to the appellants' exports.
Analysis: The exemption granted earlier in respect of black pepper was rescinded by Notification No. 147/85-Cus. and the export duty was revised by Notification No. 148/85-Cus., both dated 7-5-1985. The material question was whether these notifications had taken effect on the date of publication in the Official Gazette. The record contained no evidence that the Gazette was made available to the public only after the exports had been completed. On the contrary, the appellants themselves filed shipping bills on 7-5-1985 and 9-5-1985 and paid duty in terms of the revised notifications, which supported the inference that the notifications were already available.
Conclusion: The revised export duty was held applicable to the exports in question, and the appellants were not entitled to refund.