Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to proforma credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules in respect of duty-paid wrapper paper used for packing paper and, if so, whether the matter should be remanded for reconsideration.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had held that proforma credit under Rule 56A was available to manufacturers of wrapper paper. In view of that position and the appellants' request, accepted without objection from the Revenue, the Tribunal found it appropriate to send the matter back for examination of eligibility on the basis of relevant facts, documents, and material particulars. The appellants were also to be given an opportunity of personal hearing before any fresh order.
Conclusion: The issue of proforma credit was restored to the Assistant Collector for fresh consideration under Rule 56A, in favour of the assessee.