Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported product "PARATAC", described as a polyisobutylene-based oil solution used as a tackiness agent in mineral oils and greases, was classifiable under Heading 39.01/06 as a polymer product or under Heading 38.01/19(3) as a prepared additive for mineral oils.
Analysis: The technical literature showed that PARATAC was an oil solution of high molecular weight isobutylene polymer, used in small concentrations as a tackiness agent in non-drip and non-splatter oils and greases. The supplier's specifications and invoice indicated that it was a mixture of polyisobutylene and specially prepared oil, with polyisobutylene only forming a small percentage by volume. The product was not liquid polyisobutylene as such, and the relevant tariff scheme treated prepared additives for mineral oils as falling under Chapter 38 rather than Chapter 39. The competing Chapter 39 entry was therefore not attracted.
Conclusion: The product was classifiable under Heading 38.01/19(3) and not under Heading 39.01/06.