Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel flats purchased from a manufacturer availing exemption under Notification No. 208/83-C.E. were eligible for deemed modvat credit under the Government of India order dated 7-4-1986.
Analysis: The order dated 7-4-1986 allowed deemed credit for specified inputs purchased from outside, but denied it only where the inputs were clearly recognisable as non-duty paid or charged to nil rate of duty. The exemption under Notification No. 208/83-C.E. was held to be materially different from goods charged to nil rate of duty under the tariff. Reference was made to Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 to explain that goods exempted by notification remain goods subject to the tariff rate, though exempted, and are not necessarily goods charged to nil rate of duty. The later Government of India order dated 2-5-1988, which expressly added the words 'wholly exempt from duty', was treated as showing that the earlier order did not cover wholly exempt goods. The purchases from another manufacturer were also treated as purchases from the open market.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was admissible under the 7-4-1986 order even though the flats were received from a manufacturer availing exemption under Notification No. 208/83-C.E.; the disallowance of credit was unsustainable.