Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polymethyl methacrylate copolymer resins manufactured from methyl methacrylate monomer with other acrylic monomers were entitled to the concessional rate of central excise duty under Notification No. 241/82 dated 1-11-1982.
Analysis: The tariff entry under T.I. 15A(1) covered polymerisation and co-polymerisation products and did not confine the description to unmodified or homopolymer resins. The notification likewise used the expression "Polymethyl methacrylate" without stating that only pure or homopolymer forms were eligible. Since the goods were admittedly polymethyl methacrylate products, the mere presence of some other monomers by way of copolymerisation did not take them outside the notification.
Conclusion: The concessional rate of duty was available to the goods and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.