Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 175/86, the exemption limit of Rs. 15 lakhs applied separately to each specified item subject to the overall aggregate limit of Rs. 30 lakhs, so that duty-paid clearances of one item would not reduce the exemption available for another item.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the notification could not be construed so as to discriminate between manufacturers merely because they arranged clearances of different goods in a different order according to their production or market programme. An interpretation that makes the availability of exemption depend on the sequence of clearances, rather than on satisfaction of the substantive conditions of the notification, was found to be irrational. Subject to the other requirements of the notification being fulfilled, the exemption upto Rs. 15 lakhs was available for each category of specified goods, and duty-paid clearances of one category did not take away that entitlement for another category.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to claim the exemption separately for each specified item upto the prescribed limit, and the matter was remitted for de novo consideration of the refund claim in accordance with the notification.