Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dividend declared by a company subject to remittance from Pakistan constituted a valid declaration of dividend so as to be taxable as deemed income under section 12(1A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Section 12(1A) applies only when a dividend is in law "declared". A declaration of dividend is effective only when it creates an enforceable obligation and gives rise to a debt payable to the shareholder. Where the resolution is framed so that declaration itself is conditional upon remittance from a foreign country, the condition affects the very declaration and not merely the mode of payment. Such a resolution does not create an immediate right in favour of the shareholder and does not amount to a declaration of dividend within the meaning of the income-tax provision. The statutory context in section 207 of the Companies Act, 1956 also supports the requirement that a declared dividend must be immediately enforceable.
Conclusion: The conditional resolution was not a valid declaration of dividend for the purpose of section 12(1A), and the amount was not chargeable to tax as income of the previous year in which it was declared.
Ratio Decidendi: A dividend declaration is effective for tax purposes only if it creates an immediately enforceable debt in favour of the shareholder; a declaration made subject to a condition precedent does not amount to a declaration of dividend under section 12(1A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.