Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax on security agency services was validly invoked and whether penalty was sustainable.
Analysis: The appellant accepted receipt of consideration for taxable security agency services and had paid service tax on only part of the receipts during the same financial year. This conduct negatived the asserted bona fide belief that, as a welfare-oriented cooperative society, it had no service-tax liability. Its bye-laws also contemplated net profit, and its cooperative character did not distinguish it from a commercial entity for this purpose. Tax was payable on the gross amount received for the taxable service under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The non-payment of tax on the balance receipts was found to evince an intent to evade payment, justifying invocation of the extended limitation period and imposition of penalty.
Conclusion: The extended period was validly invoked, and the service-tax demand and penalty were sustainable against the assessee.