Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer pricing adjustment relating to the contract manufacturing and contract research and development segments was sustainable.
Analysis: The transfer pricing adjustment was based principally on the margins agreed under the assessee's earlier advance pricing agreement, despite the assessee having undertaken contemporaneous benchmarking under the transactional net margin method. The unchanged functional, asset and risk profile gave the earlier APA persuasive value, but did not by itself justify rejection of the current-year benchmarking. The Revenue did not identify any defect in the comparables or undertake an independent alternative benchmarking exercise. The margins earned during the year were broadly aligned with the APA margins and fell within the permissible tolerance band under the transfer pricing provisions.
Conclusion: The international transactions were at arm's length and the transfer pricing adjustment was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Earlier APA margins may serve as a persuasive benchmark for a subsequent year where the functional, asset and risk profile remains unchanged, but they cannot alone displace contemporaneous benchmarking without material defects or independent contrary analysis being established.