Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption for capital gains on transfer of agricultural land was available where the land was cultivated through local villagers and replacement agricultural land was purchased within the prescribed period.
Analysis: The land's agricultural character was established through revenue records, registration details, agricultural subsidy receipts, photographs of mango orchards and agricultural income disclosed in earlier returns. Agricultural use need not involve personal cultivation by the assessee; cultivation through third parties constitutes use for agricultural purposes. The assessee's earlier returns showing agricultural income from the same land had been accepted, and an identical claim of the assessee's brother in respect of the same survey land and transaction was accepted without any material distinction in facts. Absence of bills for agricultural produce or cultivation expenditure did not displace the evidence that local cultivators undertook the operations.
Conclusion: The transferred land was used for agricultural purposes during the two years preceding its transfer, and the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 54B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 upon purchase of replacement agricultural land.