TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether loss from derivative transactions was covered by the Explanation to Section 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and whether the related expense disallowance was sustainable; (ii) Whether disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be made in the absence of exempt income.
Issue (i): Whether loss from derivative transactions was covered by the Explanation to Section 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and whether the related expense disallowance was sustainable.
Analysis: The Explanation to Section 73 deems a company to be carrying on speculation business only to the extent that its business consists of the purchase and sale of shares of other companies. Derivative transactions on a recognised stock exchange, covered by Section 43(5)(d), are not transactions in the purchase and sale of shares for this purpose. Accordingly, the derivative loss was required to be treated as business loss rather than speculative loss. The estimated expense allocation was also unsupported by a proper basis, though a reduced amount attributable to share-trading activity was considered reasonable.
Conclusion: The share-trading loss of INR 9,11,932 and expense disallowance of INR 1,00,000 were sustained, while the balance addition was deleted.
Issue (ii): Whether disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be made in the absence of exempt income.
Analysis: Section 14A applies to expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of total income. Since no exempt dividend income was earned, no disallowance could be made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The disallowance could also not exceed the amount of exempt income.
Conclusion: The disallowance of INR 9,910 under Section 14A was deleted.
Final Conclusion: Derivative losses were recognised as business losses, only the substantiated portion of the share-trading-related disallowance was retained, and the Section 14A disallowance was eliminated for want of exempt income.
Ratio Decidendi: The Explanation to Section 73 applies to purchase and sale of shares and does not deem eligible derivative transactions to be speculation transactions; further, Section 14A disallowance cannot be made where no exempt income has been earned.
TaxTMI 
