Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether revision under section 263 was justified when the Assessing Officer had examined the impugned purchase and sale transactions, rejected the books under section 145(3), and adopted a profit-estimation approach on a possible view of the matter.
Analysis: The assessment record showed repeated notices, requisitions, and replies on the genuineness of the transactions, including verification of parties, invoices, bank records, transportation details, and GST-related particulars. The Assessing Officer thereafter rejected the books and estimated gross profit on the disputed transactions. The revisionary authority sought to substitute that approach with substantive additions and penal consequences, treating the assessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. However, the material on record showed that enquiry was in fact conducted and the Assessing Officer had taken a reasoned view on estimation of profit in a case involving alleged non-genuine purchases and sales. In such circumstances, the case fell within the category of enquiry made, even if another view was possible, and not a case of complete absence of enquiry.
Conclusion: Revision under section 263 was not justified, as the Assessing Officer's view was a possible view reached after due enquiry.