TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax's order passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (i.e., whether the Commissioner properly exercised revisionary powers by holding the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue).
Analysis: Section 263 permits the Commissioner to revise an Assessing Officer's order only if the Commissioner records a conclusion that the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. The term 'erroneous' includes failure to make required enquiries but, where the Assessing Officer has conducted enquiries, mere disagreement or the existence of an inadequate inquiry does not suffice. In cases where the Assessing Officer has made enquiries, the Commissioner must examine the record and, if necessary after making further inquiry, record a clear, unambiguous finding on merits that the order is unsustainable in law. A direction to remand for further enquiry without the Commissioner first recording that the order is erroneous does not satisfy the statutory precondition for exercise of revisionary power. Applied to the present facts, the Commissioner merely expressed doubts about valuation and sale consideration and directed a fresh assessment without independently determining or recording that the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous; the Commissioner's reliance on Schedule III to the Wealth Tax Act as a basis for asserting error was not a recorded finding establishing the assessment order to be unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was correct in setting aside the Commissioners order under Section 263; the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed and the decision is in favour of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
