Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the name of an amalgamating company that had ceased to exist after amalgamation was valid.
Analysis: The record showed that the amalgamation had taken effect before the assessment order was passed and that the Revenue had been informed of the merger. On these admitted facts, the assessment was made in the name of a non-existent entity. The admitted legal position is that once amalgamation takes effect, the amalgamating company loses its identity in law, and any assessment framed thereafter in its name is not a mere irregularity but a jurisdictional defect. The Tribunal also held that the additional ground could be admitted because the relevant facts were already on record and no fresh inquiry was required.
Conclusion: The assessment order was void ab initio and was quashed. The additional ground was allowed, and the challenge to the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was not adjudicated as it had become academic.